Advanced Placement (AP) English Language and Composition Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Study for the AP English Language and Composition Exam. Prepare with practice questions and detailed explanations. Enhance your rhetorical strategies and composition skills to excel in your exam!

Practice this question and more.


What is the definition of a red herring in argumentation?

  1. A misleading tactic used to distract from the main issue

  2. A strategy that strengthens the main argument

  3. An effective method of summarizing points

  4. An analogy that highlights relevant details

The correct answer is: A misleading tactic used to distract from the main issue

A red herring in argumentation refers to a misleading tactic used to distract from the main issue. This technique typically involves introducing irrelevant information or arguments that divert attention from the topic at hand, making it harder for the audience to follow the main line of reasoning or to address the original argument. This tactic is often employed strategically in debates or discussions to shift focus away from weaknesses in one's stance or to provoke emotional responses that steer the discourse in a different direction. By introducing this distraction, the person using the red herring may attempt to gain an advantage or evade accountability for their position. The other options present strategies that do not align with the definition of a red herring. Instead of distraction, a strategy that strengthens the main argument would stay focused on relevant evidence or reasoning. A method of summarizing points typically aids clarity and does not distract, while an analogy that highlights relevant details serves to enhance understanding rather than divert attention.