Advanced Placement (AP) English Language and Composition Practice Exam

In argumentation, the use of scare tactics is best exemplified by which of the following?

1. Providing comprehensive statistical evidence

2. Discussing potential risks in a balanced manner

3. Exaggerating dangers to provoke fear

4. Offering solutions to potential problems

The correct answer is: Exaggerating dangers to provoke fear

The use of scare tactics in argumentation involves exaggerating dangers or presenting information in a way that instills fear in the audience in order to persuade them to accept a particular viewpoint or take a specific action. Option C accurately captures this idea by focusing on the exaggeration of dangers, which is a hallmark of scare tactics. This method often disregards rational analysis in favor of emotional appeal, aiming to provoke a strong reaction rather than encouraging thoughtful consideration of the facts. In contrast, the other options illustrate approaches that do not align with scare tactics. Providing comprehensive statistical evidence involves presenting factual information to support an argument and persuading based on logic rather than fear. Discussing potential risks in a balanced manner encourages viewers to understand both sides of an argument and weigh pros and cons thoughtfully. Offering solutions to potential problems implies a constructive approach that seeks to alleviate concerns rather than exacerbate them. Thus, option C is the clearest representation of scare tactics in argumentation.