Advanced Placement (AP) English Language and Composition Practice Exam

The argument style that emphasizes understanding opposing viewpoints to foster persuasive communication is the Rogerian argument. This approach is grounded in the idea that effective communication and persuasion require acknowledging and respecting differing perspectives rather than attempting to discredit or dismiss them outright. By identifying common ground and demonstrating empathy towards opposing views, a Rogerian argument aims to create a more cooperative dialogue. This method can lead to a more productive discussion and allows for a more nuanced exploration of complex issues, ultimately making it easier to persuade the audience towards a shared conclusion.

In contrast, traditional arguments often take a more adversarial approach, focusing on establishing one's own viewpoint while dismantling the opponent's stance. Argument from ignorance relies on the premise that a lack of evidence against a claim is sufficient to prove it true, which does not involve understanding opposing viewpoints. Anecdotal arguments depend on personal stories or isolated examples rather than structured reasoning, and while they can engage an audience, they do not prioritize opposing perspectives as part of their persuasive strategy.